Indeed, sometimes whether a risk pays off is dependent on your approach to it (just ask Icarus and Daedalus), as opposed to being dependent on the risk itself. In this vein, we think it is sometimes important to understand the investment risks you are taking. Not in terms of volatility; however, we think there may be one obvious macroeconomic risk (or opportunity, depending on your viewpoint) that needs to be considered when constructing portfolios and selecting strategies at this time. That is the current confluence of two core investment decisions and one macroeconomic variable.
Companies: Jupiter European Opportunities Trust (JEO:LON)Blackrock World Mining Trust (BRWM:LON)
European Opportunities Trust (JEO) has been managed by Alexander Darwall since launch in 2000. In late 2019, JEO followed Alexander to his new fund-management company – Devon Equity Management. The same bottom-up, fundamental investment strategy is applied as has always been. Alexander looks to identify companies that retain high-growth characteristics and profitability longer than the market expects and to hold them for the long term. Another characteristic of JEO has meant that 2020 has been a standout year for all the wrong reasons. Alexander manages high-conviction, concentrated portfolios. Over the long term this has meant he has delivered strong returns relative to the benchmark and his peer group. However, during 2020 Wirecard (now sold, but until relatively recently JEO’s largest holding) has had a significant negative impact on recent performance. As we discuss in the Portfolio section, Alexander’s lessons learnt include the recognition that the sizing of the position had clearly been too big given the complex nature of the business, but also that he had placed too much trust in the wrong people in his due-diligence process. Nevertheless, if Alexander had not followed his investment process so rigorously (by selling immediately when the facts as he knew them changed), the impact on performance would have been significantly worse. Over the long term JEO typically employs gearing. However, as we show in Gearing, it was taken down to zero in May. This represented an overall market de-risking exercise, and indirectly helped mitigate the damage from Wirecard. The discount has widened to c.10% since June and both the board of JEO and Alexander himself have recently bought in shares at these levels.
Companies: Jupiter European Opportunities Trust
Jupiter European Opportunities (JEO) offers investors exposure to a portfolio of European companies that offer good prospects for capital growth; irrespective of short-term economic trends and the business cycle. The portfolio is run by Alexander Darwall, one of the most successful fund managers in the investment trust space in recent years. The results of Alexander’s long-term, high conviction view and stock-picking approach can be seen in the performance numbers. Over a five year period, JEO boasts an alpha of 6.25 and a Sharpe ratio of 1.08. In NAV terms, JEO remains amongst the best performers in the European equities investment trust peer group over three, five and ten years. JEO has consistently traded at a premium rating relative to the rest of its peer group. Recent uncertainty relating to its continuing management arrangements has, however, resulted in a small discount of 2.5% as at the time of writing.
The most terrifying words in the English language are, or were at least according to the late president of the United States Ronald Regan: "I'm from the government and I'm here to help." and for investors in global smaller companies, this could be prescient. Most investors into smaller caps are attracted by the prospect of exponential business growth. Young companies with innovative products are supposed to offer a disruptive threat to established companies, with huge potential markets to grow into. However, developments in society and politics could be calling into question the ability of smaller companies to generate the same excess returns in the coming decades. The chief issue is regulation: while regulation is often mooted as in the interest of society at large, there is evidence that in recent years the chief beneficiaries of regulation have been the large players in existing industries, who are better able to adapt to the increasing costs. In this study we consider how the regulatory burden is affecting markets around the world and what it means for investors in the various regions.
Companies: JUS USA JEO MINI AJOT
In our recent research, Measure for Measure, we discussed the importance of a manager’s activeness and the difficulties involved in gauging it. As we have highlighted before, the chance of generating alpha generally rises with how active a manager is, and the UK closed-ended universe has become significantly more active in response to the challenge of cheap passive products. In that article we took a look at a range of measures for assessing the ‘activeness’ of a manager and their strengths and weaknesses. In this article we take a deep dive into the numbers, using tracking error, concentration, gearing and sector movements to look at how active the managers are across the major closed-ended equity sectors; the UK All Companies, UK Equity Income, Global, Global Equity Income, Japan, Europe and North American sectors. We rank the trusts based on each individual metric, but also relative to the rest of the sectors. Finally, we discuss which trusts stand out across the different metrics, and establish an overall ranking for each trust which shows how ‘active’ they are. As always, we are not recommending anything here, and this ranking should not be construed as anything other than a scale showing how ‘active’ each fund is relative to the other funds in the study, according to the metrics we have used. Neither are we suggesting that being very active is, in itself, meritorious.
Companies: IIT LTI SMT JEO FSV BGEU SCF JMF DIG
Fees in the fund management world are a hot topic, and average fees across collective investment funds around the world have seen relentless declines. According to research from Morningstar, the average asset-weighted fee for actively managed equity funds has fallen by 18% since 2013, compared with a 28% decline at passive funds.
Companies: JAM ATST SUPP JEO RIV
“The single greatest edge an investor can have is a long-term orientation”, according to Seth Klarman, the American billionaire hedge fund investor. On the Hargreaves Lansdown platform the number of people with more than £1m in their ISA has increased from just three in 2012 to 168 today. However while this sounds very impressive, £1m doesn’t seem that fanciful given full historic contributions to PEPs and ISAs since 1987 would have added up to more than £291,000. We calculate that an investor would “only” have to have generated an IRR of 7.74% on every year’s subscription to have generated a seven-figure sum today. ISAs offer an excellent way to grow capital and benefit from compounding (that eighth “wonder of the world”) over the very long- term entirely free from the clutches of HMRC. Investments are tax neutral within the ISA wrapper, and in contrast to a SIPP, there is zero tax payable on the entire amount when capital or income is withdrawn. Another contrast to a SIPP is that there is no size limit – under current legislation an individual’s ISA can be as big as it gets. Whilst building an ISA pot of £1m is clearly a huge achievement, our analysis suggests that many investment trust managers would have delivered significantly more. There are around 48 trusts for which we have meaningful statistics going back to 1987 which have had broadly the same strategy and/or elements of the same management team over this time. Of these, an incredible 34 trusts would have delivered a total ISA value (share price returns net of fund fees, but before the ISA wrapper fees) of over £1m, if an individual had put their entire PEP / ISA subscriptions in the same trust every year.
Companies: SMT IIT JEO IEM JEO ICGT OCI SUPP ATST LWI FGT
Jupiter European Opportunities (JEO) typifies a fund run by an investor who takes a long-term view, and applies that view with high conviction. As a result of Alexander Darwall’s stockpicking, JEO has reigned supreme for the past decade in both consistency and the extent of its outperformance – even despite the recent falls in the share price of the trust’s largest holding Wirecard. Since 2000, Alexander has invested JEO’s capital in the same manner – by owning what he sees as exceptional companies, expected to grow thanks to long-term structural trends largely uncorrelated to the wider economic environment / stock market cycles. He expects to hold these companies for the long term, and has demonstrated that he runs winners. His low turnover and high conviction approach mean that currently there are four holdings within the portfolio (currently accounting for 24% of NAV by value) which have been part of the portfolio for twelve years. Alexander has a high degree of flexibility to manage the portfolio as he sees fit. That he runs winners means that the portfolio concentration is much greater than one would normally find, with the top ten holdings representing 78% of NAV at the last month end. Additionally, he has full latitude to invest outside of European-listed companies, the requirement only being that most companies held will undertake a substantial proportion of their business activities within Europe. Currently c. 26% of assets are invested in UK-listed companies. By the managers’ calculations less than half (45%) of the portfolio’s companies’ sales come from Europe. The results of Alexander’s stock-picking and his high conviction approach can be seen unambiguously in the performance numbers. Despite recent travails with Wirecard - the trust’s largest holding as at 31st January 2019 - on a total return basis, JEO remains amongst the best performers in the European peer group in NAV terms over one, three, five and ten years. Since 2001 (the first full year of being manager) Alexander has only underperformed the benchmark (FTSE World Europe Ex-UK Index) in two years – 2008 and 2016. The compounding effect of Alexander’s outperformance has meant that the trust has delivered stellar results for shareholders. Over the last ten years (to 13th February 2019) the trust has delivered NAV total returns of 543% against a benchmark return of 160%, and the Morningstar Europe investment trust peer group average return of 212%. Relative to peers, according to Morningstar’s “style” analysis, JEO has the purest “growth” portfolio of the investment trust peer group. It is also the only trust which has any significant exposure to UK stocks, and whilst over the long run the NAV has similar volatility to that of its peers, over the past one and three years it has been the most volatile. Gearing has over the long term averaged around 10%, according to the Morningstar. The manager tends to deploy gearing when he sees opportunities at a stock level. During the summer of 2018, gearing reached a relatively low level (by historic standards) of 3%. Following the sell-off from September 2018 into the year end, gearing was increased to its current level of c 6%. JEO has consistently traded at a premium rating relative to the rest of the Europe investment trust peer group, and for much of the past year traded on a premium in absolute terms. The recent volatility in NAV – largely thanks to Wirecard - has meant that the discount has once again widened out to 5%.
Today, we introduce our investment trust ratings. According to the quantitative screens we have selected in an attempt to highlight the best performers in the closed-ended universe, the trusts discussed here have been the best in their classes over the last five years. We have selected trusts using two different sets of criteria, aiming to identify the top performers for capital growth and for achieving a high and growing income. There are many rating systems for open-ended funds, but no quantitative-based system for investment trusts that is available to the average investor. While we cannot identify trusts which will perform well in the future – past outperformance is no guide to future out-performance – we hope these ratings will highlight the outstanding performers in the closed-ended universe and those managers who have best used the advantages of investment trusts to generate alpha. We are trying to reward consistent and long-term outperformance, and so we have decided to look over a five-year period. All data is as of the end of December 2018, sourced from Morningstar and JPMorgan Cazenove. We have looked at NAV total return performance and discount value has not been considered: the aim is to identify those trusts which have performed the best rather than highlight bargains.
Companies: IPU FAS ATR JEO FEV FGT THRG SEC PAC BRSC IAT HNE MIGO TRY JMG DIVI SLS BGS SDP JETI SOI BCI MRC TIGT EDIN JAGI BEE SDV BRIG AAIF HFEL SCF SIGT BRFI IVPG CTY HINT JCH NAIT
It was only last year that Europe was considered one of the hottest sectors, and we produced research (‘En Garde!’) highlighting the sheer pace at which the discounts were narrowing, and how the sector was witnessing its highest inflows since 2015. Over a one-year period, to the end of July 2017, the average trust in the sector had delivered NAV total returns of 26% which – supported by that closing discount – translated to share price total returns of 39%. To put that in context, the average fund in the sector outperformed the average fund in any and all of the Investment Association’s OEIC sectors over the same period. However, this has all but completely been forgotten and, rightly or wrongly, Europe is now one of the most out of favour geographical sectors in the world. We believe it is likely to be ‘wrongly’, and having met with multiple European fund managers, we feel there may be a discrepancy between the opportunities in Europe, and the sentiment of investors. We look at a range of investment trusts and examine the case for Europe.
Companies: FEV BEE JEO
Research due to be published in the CFA’s Financial Analysts Journal claims to demystify Warren Buffett’s astonishing long-term success, and shows how he has achieved his incredible run of returns. In a nutshell, the Buffett “secret sauce” is leveraging up low beta, cheap, high quality stocks. This approach has allowed Buffett to generate a high information ratio - a ratio used by analysts to show risk-adjusted returns relative to a benchmark - over a multi-decade career, and returns which have generated significant value over a passive investment strategy. Using the same analytical ratio as a starting point - albeit over a shorter time period - we identify investment trust managers in the UK who have generated returns with similar characteristics, and then examine their investment style. We then consider whether Buffett’s “secret sauce” is past its sell by date; could it be that the approach which worked so well for him in the past is dated now, in a world where innovative disruption is occurring at an ever-faster pace?
Companies: BGFD HNE BGS JEO SJG THRG
When comparing performance across the investment trust sector as a whole, Jupiter European Opportunities (JEO) has delivered a consistently strong performance, stumbling only twice - in 2008 and 2016; both highly unusual years for reasons which are well known. Since 2000, Alexander Darwall has invested JEO’s capital in the same manner – by investing in what he sees as exceptional companies, expected to grow irrespective of the wider economic environment or stock market cycles. He sets great store by company meetings with management, trying to identify the twin pillars of “the right company” and “the right management” which underpin his disciplined approach to stock selection. Having identified these companies, he looks to identify long-term structural trends which will help the company grow. Alexander has a high degree of flexibility to manage the portfolio as he sees fit. For example, the portfolio concentration is much greater than one would normally find with the top ten holdings representing 75% of NAV. Additionally, he has full latitude to invest outside of continental European listed companies, the requirement only being that most companies held will undertake a substantial proportion of their business activities within Europe. Currently c. 25% of assets are invested in UK listed companies. In the managers view, their investee companies are increasingly global, but are unified by their common roots as being driven by European expertise. Compared to the AIC Europe peer group, JEO has been the best performer over one, three, five and 10 years. Since 2001 Alexander has only underperformed the benchmark (FTSE World Europe Ex-UK Index) in two years – 2008 and 2016. The compounding effect of Alexander’s outperformance has meant that the trust has delivered a strong result for shareholders. Over the last ten years the trust has delivered NAV total returns of 440% against a benchmark return of 135%, and a return from the average IA European (inc. UK) fund of 148%. Relative to peers, according to Morningstar’s “style” analysis, JEO has the purest “growth” portfolio of the investment trust peer group. It is also the only trust which has any significant exposure to UK stocks, and whilst over the long run the NAV has similar volatility to that of its peers, over the past three years it has been the most volatile. Gearing has over the long term, averaged around 10% according to the Morningstar. Gearing was ramped up quite significantly in 2016, when the manager saw new opportunities emerging in the wake of Brexit, and started 2017 at 17%. The managers use gearing in a highly tactical fashion, however, and the level of gearing fluctuates significantly - the current level of gearing is in the region of 3%. JEO has consistently traded at a premium rating to the rest of the investment trust peer group and has been trading on a premium of c.3% in recent times.
At the latter stages of a bull market, enthusiasm can sometimes get the better of all of us. Investors always find ways to justify prices for companies at any stage in the cycle. To contrarians, the fact that the price of something has gone up tenfold doesn’t necessarily make it more attractive. However, momentum (as it is now called) is popularly touted as a sustainable investment strategy for the long term. Have the proponents of the ‘ever the greater fool’ theory had a re-brand? Within the world of investment trusts, ‘excessive optimism’ is more easily measured in terms of premiums to net asset value (NAV). This is particularly the case where the majority of a trust’s assets are themselves quoted. Of the 90 trusts (or investment companies) which currently stand on premiums, 55% have illiquid and/or unlisted assets representing greater than 50% of their portfolios. With these trusts, overenthusiasm is perhaps a little less easy to gauge – it is entirely possible that either valuations have moved on since the last official valuation, or that the board is being conservative in its valuations. Either way, each is likely to have its own story and a premium is not necessarily an indicator of excessive optimism. We list below the trusts which have greater than 50% of their assets in listed or publicly traded investments, yet trade at significant premiums. One of the common themes observable is that of strong relative performance over recent times. However, whether you are a contrarian or not (or a follower of momentum as a strategy), we believe that paying anything over a very modest premium is setting yourself up for a fall. Premiums are very rarely sustainable and tend to evaporate at inflection points, exacerbating a poor period of performance from a manager in absolute or relative terms. Indeed, the table below shows how quickly a premium can be eroded, with a corresponding effect on shareholder returns, irrespective of manager performance.
Companies: MAJE SUPP IBT SLPE ICGT IIT SEC JEO SYNC III
Since the launch of the first index fund in 1976, passive investing has proven to be a successful investment strategy for both institutional and retail investors. The first of its kind, the Vanguard 500 Index fund, has delivered an annualised rate of return of 10.01% totalling to a return of over 1,500% since 1989. Whilst good in absolute terms, in relative terms because of fees it has underperformed the index, with the S&P 500 delivering an annualised return of 10.12% over the same period. Although there is only a small difference between the two annually, we calculate that over the 42 years this equates to underperformance of c.53%. However, this difference is a declining feature, and with fees now at only 0.14%, another 42 year period would see a difference of only 6% relative to the index. On the other hand, active management hasn’t (if one looks at the performance of the average fund) covered itself with glory either in terms of outperforming benchmarks. According to the most recent S&P Indices vs Active Management (SPIVA) report, which offers information on the passive vs active debate in the US over the course of 2017, 63.1% of large-cap managers, 44.4% of mid-cap managers, and 47.7% of small-cap managers underperformed the S&P 500, the S&P MidCap 400, and the S&P SmallCap 600, respectively. Over a five-year period, the numbers look even worse for supporters of active management:- 84.23% of large-cap managers, 85.06% of mid-cap managers, and 91.17% of small-cap managers lagged their respective benchmarks. Outperformance of a benchmark is possible, but the numbers above suggest that active managers are mediocre, and that those who can achieve outperformance over the long term are therefore difficult to identify. So, what marks this small sub-set out? What are the small minority of active managers who are outperforming their benchmarks doing differently?
Companies: FGT JEO SMT ATST IIT
Fresh news from the Quirinal Palace on Saturday – with the Italian president effectively vetoing the government put forward by the anti-establishment Five Star Movement and the far-right League – has put Italy, and the future cohesion of the Eurozone, in the spotlight once again. Stocks and bonds were already under pressure before the announcement that the coalition’s preferred candidate for finance minister – Paulo Savona – had been rejected by the president, who put forward instead Carlo Cottarelli, a former IMF official, who some argue plays into populists’ hands as another example of the Italian establishment’s thrall to Brussels. The League and the Five Star Movement have previously called for Italy’s withdrawal from the Euro and both support policies which would ride roughshod over eurozone rules on budget deficits. The danger is that, by appearing to pander to Brussels, the president’s action on Saturday may backfire – fomenting even greater populist feeling among a population already deeply resentful of EU ‘meddling’. While this may seem like a return to form for the troubled Union after an uncharacteristically smooth patch, we think a sanguine approach makes sense. Italian politics works on compromise and backtracking, and the coalition documents suggest an exit from the euro is not on the cards. In fact, with the economic environment in Europe generally positive, any volatility in Europe generated by the headlines surrounding Italy could throw up some interesting opportunities. Viewed with a cooler head, little has changed in Europe since the weekend and the environment of low inflation and cheap money looks set to remain dominant. Unprecedentedly loose monetary policy from the ECB remains firmly in place, and the debate continues over whether the eurozone economy will be strong enough to allow policymakers to end the QE programme in September. President of the ECB, Mario Draghi, has recently announced that the interest rates on refinancing and on lending would remain unchanged at 0 per cent and 0.25 per cent respectively for the foreseeable future, providing technical support for European stock markets.
Companies: HNE JESC BRGE BEE JEO
Research Tree provides access to ongoing research coverage, media content and regulatory news on Jupiter European Opportunities Trust.
We currently have 34 research reports from 2
Avation is a lessor of 46 commercial aircraft to a diversified airline client base. This morning, the group has released results for the 12-months to 30 June 2020, which illustrate the challenges faced by its customer base as a result of Covid-19, as well as the corrective actions taken by the Board that have resulted in profitability being maintained in the year as a whole. Loan repayment deferrals of c.$24.4m were obtained in the period, in comparison to $13.1m short-term rent deferrals being granted to airline customers and thus emphasising management's focus on liquidity during an unprecedented period for global airlines. Avation again reports that it is currently reviewing alternatives in relation to the 6.5% senior notes due in May 2021. Whilst at this point our forecasts remain under review, and near term challenges remain across the industry, we believe that demand for aircraft from lessors such as Avation will increase in time as a result of airlines being even more reliant upon aircraft leasing firms due to the retirement of older aircraft during 2020 in combination with much weaker balance sheets that are unable to support direct aircraft purchases.
Companies: Avation PLC
As expected following the US banks’ releases, Barclays’ third quarter results saw a sharp reduction in provisions build-up while the emergence of delinquencies has been delayed by the State’s supporting measures. Management continues to expect a reduction in the cost of risk next year. It remains to be seen if this guidance is capable of withstanding new lockdowns or a no-deal Brexit.
Companies: Barclays PLC
In another upbeat update, GHT has confirmed that the business is tracking in line, in turn being driven by strong traction with key customer, ANZ. Here, new sales have driven a 20% increase in contracted customer revenue to >£11m in FY21. As a strategic partner (deeply involved with GHT in bringing new Clareti banking services to market) this extra investment is very encouraging, as it’s indicative of these services‘ strong future potential. Also announced today – GHT state that its transition to a recurring subscription model (commenced just two years ago) is now complete and that ARR now stands at £11.9m, ~+16% annualised organic growth since FY20 y/e. In a tough new business environment, we view this as a highly credible performance. It’s also worth noting that management reference remaining pipeline opportunities, these would further benefit strong forwards visibility – already £22.4m for FY21. Given this – and also as sign of confidence – today we reinstate FY21 forecasts. We look for a reacceleration in top-line growth: +16% y/y to £28.7m at a Group level, in turn driven by c.+24% organic growth in Clareti, to £20m. For valuation – with Clareti still in its relative infancy – we continue to view a sales multiple as most appropriate. Here, we note that peers typically trade in a 5-7x range vs. GHT at 4x our FY21 estimate. This suggests 25-75% upside to fair value for this disruptive company, with a multi-year growth opportunity still ahead.
Companies: Gresham House
Record’s Q221 trading update confirmed that its new $8bn dynamic hedging mandate has started and that, prior to this, assets under management equivalent (AUME) expanded by 4% in the quarter. The group continues to work on developing new products and is deploying technology to enhance its ability to deliver these and existing products cost effectively.
Companies: Record plc
The interims confirmed that Covid-19 was minimally disruptive operationally in H1 20 and, ironically, may have improved both of R&Q’s divisions’ mediumterm trading outlooks. As the pandemic and other industry events have generated significant losses for insurers, they have created the current ‘hardening’ market driving demand for Legacy and Program Management.
Companies: Randall & Quilter Investment Holdings Ltd.
Agronomics has announced it has conditionally raised £10.0m gross from an equity issue at a price of 6.0p, which represents a 6.8% premium to the most recently reported NAV per share of 5.62p. Assuming the company's post-raise cash balance is £8.15m, after repaying a £1.9m bridging facility, we estimate the new NAV per share to be c5.7p. We see significant potential in the cultivated meat sector and believe Agronomics is well positioned to support this developing sector and generate strong returns from these investments. We see upside in Agronomics' portfolio and have today initiated coverage with a Buy recommendation.
Companies: Agronomics Limited
Following on quickly from its impressive full year results, these interim results confirm that our confidence for growth in the Program Management business was not misplaced.Contracted Premium increased 95% YoY (and 12% ahead of December 2019) to $925m –a stone's throw away from the $1bn 2020 guidance set in 2018. At the same time, Gross Written Premium (GWP) grew 42.6% to £247.2m, resulting in Economic EBITDA turning positive, at £0.8m compared to a loss of £0.3m in 1H19
Agronomics is an investment company building a portfolio of investments in the developing alternative protein sector. The company is focused on early stage investments, offering attractive valuations and significant upside potential. Importantly, we believe Agronomics represents an opportunity for public investors to gain access to early stage private companies, which might not otherwise be available. We expect the cultivated meat sector to be driven by a number of global mega trends that will increase public awareness of the issues the sector is aiming to overcome. We see strong upside in Agronomics' existing portfolio and initiate coverage with a Buy recommendation.
Secure Trust Bank’s (STB) Q3 trading update disclosed that Q3 was stronger than expected and FY20 earnings are likely to be well ahead of consensus forecasts. Loan repayment holidays in its Motor Finance and Retail Finance divisions were down remarkably and credit quality is not deteriorating. Loan demand is strengthening after the lockdown. Capital and liquidity remain good. The bank remains cautious due to continued COVID-19 and Brexit uncertainty and is still not providing formal guidance. We are upping our earnings forecasts and fair value from 1,704p to 1,756p. In our view, the valuation remains depressed compared to fundamentals with banking stocks still out of favour. STB trades on an FY20 P/BV of 0.53x, yet it has a strong track record of value creating returns (ROE above COE), a good capital base and liquidity. The Q3 good news reinforces our view that we are unlikely to see book value deterioration during this downturn to justify any NAV discount.
Companies: Secure Trust Bank Plc
Litigation Capital Management has announced FY20 results with gross profit up 7% to A$21.7m and PBT of A$9.2m, slightly behind expectations albeit the Group had already flagged that delays to 3 cases during the year would result in resolutions in FY21, thereby impacting FY20 results. That said, excellent strategic progress through the year and good news flow as well as increasing scale suggests more value to come. Reiterate buy
Companies: Litigation Capital Management Ltd
There was an eclectic mix of property companies to feature in the top price movers for September. Top of the tree was private rented sector and residential development specialist Sigma Capital Group, with a 34.2% rise. The group launched a £1bn joint venture with EQT Real Estate, the real estate platform of global investment firm EQT, to deliver 3,000 private rental homes in Greater London. Micro-cap investor Panther Securities also hit double-digit gains, while Macau Property Opportunities saw an uplift in its share price after announcing debt refinancing and a disposal. CLS Holdings, the investor in offices in Germany, France and the UK, continued to see a recovery in its share price – which has risen 15.1% in the last three months. Off the back of solid results, Berlin residential landlord Phoenix Spree Deutschland saw its share price gain 7.2%. Schroder REIT’s share price rose 6.6% in the month as it embarked on a share buyback programme, while Irish commercial property investor Yew Grove REIT also saw positive shareholder reaction to amending its investment strategy to increase its target loan to value ratio to 40%.
Companies: SUPR DIGS CRC PSDL ASEI TPON RLE UKCM BREI BCPT RGL SIR SLI TOWN CAL
ANGLE plc (AGL.L): Acceptance of FDA submission | Feedback plc (FDBK.L*): Partnership agreement | Open Orphan (ORPH.L): Human Challenge Study Model contract with UK Government
Companies: AGL FDBK ORPH
Whilst there are some bright spots, such as payments companies, which are beneficiaries of the shift to online shopping, fears about the potential impact of COVID-19 have hit valuations across much of the financial sector. The fall in Polar Capital Global Financials Trust’s (PCFT’s) NAV reflects this situation.
Companies: Polar Capital Global Fincls Trust
Deltic Energy is entering an exciting phase in its development based on its fully funded joint-venture projects with Shell. Preparations are now underway for an exploration well to test the Pensacola Zechstein prospect in the SNS (Southern North Sea). Deltic has indicated that it expects the current contingent well commitment to become firm on schedule by December 1, 2020. Drilling, according to Deltic, should follow in H2 2021. We see scope for positive news flow over the next few months, not least from the evaluation of Shell’s recently obtained processed 3-D seismic over Pensacola. Following Pensacola, the Selene prospect is scheduled to be drilled in mid-2022. The recent 32nd Round UKCS licence awards greatly expands Deltic’s exploration potential in the CNS and particularly the SNS Carboniferous fairway. Here some highly prospective acreage has been obtained.
Companies: Deltic Energy PLC
To achieve YoY revenue growth over H1/20A despite the challenges of Covid-19 and its impact on the travel sector is testament to Equals' resilience and increasing focus on B2B and International payments services. While weaker gross profit and EBITDA margins have impacted profitability in H1/20, we see potential for an earnings recovery in H2/20 given cost reduction measures currently being undertaken. This should lead Equals to cash breakeven in Q4/20 and FCF positive by early FY21.
Companies: Equals Group Plc