Further analysis of our review of the 2016 IPOs confirms that the exceptional performance of AIM IPOs last year (up 42% on average) was due more to an improved performance from the laggards, rather than a much stronger performance from the leaders. As we said in our 4 January note, a ‘difficult’ market makes for a more discerning market both in terms of sorting the wheat from the chaff and valuing both appropriately.
Sign up to access
Get access to our full offering from over 30 providers
Get access to our full offering from over 30 providers
Improving the quality
- Published:
18 Jan 2017 -
Author:
Mark Brown -
Pages:
2
Further analysis of our review of the 2016 IPOs confirms that the exceptional performance of AIM IPOs last year (up 42% on average) was due more to an improved performance from the laggards, rather than a much stronger performance from the leaders. As we said in our 4 January note, a ‘difficult’ market makes for a more discerning market both in terms of sorting the wheat from the chaff and valuing both appropriately.