
NEWS RELEASE |
Quarterly Report
Summary:
· Exploration at |
During the quarter, |
Highlights included: |
· Assay results demonstrated shallow, thick zones of lithium and rubidium mineralisation, hosted within a muscovitic leucogranite, intersected in all 33 RC holes. |
· Drill intercepts include: |
o 14m @ 0.95% Li2O & 0.39% Rb2O (from 40m) |
o 18m @ 0.55% Li2O & 0.23% Rb2O (from surface) |
o 61m @ 0.50% Li2O & 0.21% Rb2O (from surface) |
o 27m @ 0.44% Li2O & 0.21% Rb2O (from surface) |
o 56m @ 0.48% Li2O & 0.21% Rb2O (from surface) |
· Samples from an additional three diamond holes completed in the drill program have been sent for preliminary metallurgical test work with results anticipated in the |
· Next steps include 3D modelling of the drilling data and completion of the preliminary metallurgical test work program. |
· Rubidium is a critical raw material for advanced technology and industrial applications used in key sectors including defence and military, aerospace, communications, medical and renewable energy. The |
· International Arbitration against |
In |
As part of its Request, BEL alleges that |
During the quarter, the Tribunal was formally constituted with the first tribunal session to be held in early |
Notwithstanding the investment dispute, BEL remains committed to the |
· Spanish Nuclear Power Industry: |
During and subsequent to the end of the quarter, there have been a number of important recent developments regarding the nuclear industry in |
· Proposal to Reverse Spain's Nuclear Phase-out Approved by |
o A Plenary Session of the |
o Subsequently, in early April, the PP registered a bill in the |
· Demonstrations |
o Approximately 7,000 people attended a demonstration against the planned closure of the Almaraz nuclear power plant in Extremadura as part of the country's nuclear phase out policy. The demonstration was called by the municipalities in the area of influence of the Almaraz nuclear power plant and the citizens' platform "Yes to Almaraz, Yes to the Future" to demand the continuation of the activity of the Extremadura plant in light of the closure planned by the central government. |
· Nuclear Power Plant Continuation |
o One of |
· Nuclear Industry Manifesto |
o Companies representing the Spanish nuclear industry have signed a manifesto calling for the long-term operation of the country's nuclear power plants. Under current plans, |
The manifesto - signed by 32 companies, including Empresarios Agrupados-GHESA (EAG), |
The signatories call on the Spanish government and relevant authorities to revise the National Integrated Energy and Climate Plan to incorporate measures ensuring the continuity of nuclear energy. "This energy source must be recognised as reliable, efficient and competitive, with low carbon emissions, and should receive fair treatment to encourage investment," they say. |
· Balance Sheet |
The Company is in a strong financial position with |
Classification: 2.2 This announcement contains inside information
For further information please contact:
Acting Managing Director Chief Operations Officer
+61 8 9322 6322 +34 923 193 903
Salamanca Project Summary
The Company has received more than 120
The project has the potential to generate measurable social and environmental benefits in the form of jobs and skills training in a depressed rural community. It can also make a significant contribution to the security of supply of Europe's zero carbon energy needs.
The Project hosts a Mineral Resource of 89.3Mlb uranium, with more than two thirds in the Measured and Indicated categories. In 2016, Berkeley published the results of a robust Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) for Salamanca confirming that the Project could be one of the world's lowest cost producers, capable of generating strong after-tax cash flows.
Figure 1: Location of the
Salamanca Project Update
During the quarter, the Company continued with its commitment to health, safety and the environment as a priority.
Berkeley has been awarded with the Carbon Neutrality Certificates for the years 2020, 2021, and 2022, by MITECO. This represents an important step in the Company's journey to combat climate change and continue contributing to sustainability.
To achieve this goal, 329 trees have been planted within the reforestation project in the public utility forest area of the Monte del Catálogo de Utilidad Pública in the province of Ávila, No. 13 "El Pinar," located in the municipality of Mijares.
These trees will absorb a total of 56 tons of CO2, a quantity expected over a 40-year period according to the reference values from the MITECO Registry. The species planted include Scots pine, birch, rowan, yew, and holly.
Thus, Berkeley, in its commitment to fighting climate change, contributes to the following Sustainable Development Goals:
Exploration
During the quarter, the Company continued with its exploration program focusing on critical minerals in Spain. The exploration initiative is targeting lithium, rubidium, tin, tantalum, niobium, tungsten, and other battery and critical metals, within the Company's existing tenements in western Spain that do not form part of Berkeley's main undertaking being the development of the
The Investigation Permit (IP) Conchas is located in the very western part of the Salamanca province, close to the Portuguese border (Figure 2). The tenement covers an area of ~31km2 in the western part of the
Figure 2: IP Conchas Location Plans and Geology / Drill Hole Location Plan
Soil sampling programs completed by Berkeley in the northern and central portions of the tenement during 2021 (200m by 200m) and 2022 (100m by 100m) defined a tin-lithium anomaly covering approximately 1.1km by 0.7km which correlated with a mapped aplo-pegmatitic leucogranite.
Based on the results of the soil sampling programs and information gleaned from a review of the available historical data, a small initial drilling program was implemented in 2022 to test the tin-lithium anomaly.
The drill program comprised five broad spaced RC holes for a total of 282m. Anomalous results for lithium (Li), tin (Sn), rubidium (Rb), cesium (Cs), niobium (Nb) and tantalum (Ta) obtained from multi-element analysis of drill samples were reported in
The occurrence of these six elements is observed to be largely associated with a sub-horizontal muscovitic leucogranite unit that locally outcrops at surface. The muscovitic leucogranite has a mapped extent of approximately 2km (in a NE-SW orientation) by 1.2km (on average in a NW-SE orientation) (Figure 2) and varies in thickness from 7m to over 170m in the drill holes (Figure 3).
A number of mineralogical studies have been undertaken to determine the mineral species present and understand their characteristics and properties. Results of these studies indicate the mineralised muscovitic leucogranite is composed mainly of plagioclase (average content of 55%) and quartz (average content of 25%), with potassium feldspar, muscovite mica, and Li-mica making up remainder of the rock. The samples have an average Li-mica content of 3%.
2024 Drilling Program
A follow-up RC and diamond core drilling program focused on improving confidence in the geology, continuity, and grade distribution of the zone of multi-element mineralisation was completed in late 2024. The drilling program comprised 33 RC holes for 1,857m drilled on a 100m by 100m grid, with depths ranging from 16m to a maximum of 169m. In addition, three diamond core holes for 230m were drilled to collect samples for metallurgical test work purposes.
All drill holes intersected muscovitic leucogranite hosted mineralisation, confirming and improving upon the results obtained in the 2022 drilling campaign. Select intercepts include:
Hole No. |
Down Hole Intercept |
From Depth (Down Hole) |
CCR006 |
27m @ 0.44% Li2O & 0.21% Rb2O 14m @ 0.95% Li2O & 0.39% Rb2O |
surface 40m |
CCR011 |
55m @ 0.31% Li2O & 0.18% Rb2O |
surface |
CCR012 |
61m @ 0.50% Li2O & 0.21% Rb2O |
surface |
CCR017 |
18m @ 0.55% Li2O & 0.23% Rb2O |
surface |
CCR025 |
56m @ 0.48% Li2O & 0.21% Rb2O |
surface |
CCR033 |
19m @ 0.35% Li2O & 0.21% Rb2O |
surface |
Based on geological logging of all drill holes and the assay results returned from the RC holes, the following observations were made regarding geology, continuity, and grade distribution:
· the mineralised muscovite leucogranite is very homogeneous in terms of mineralogy |
· the distribution of Rb mineralisation is the most consistent among all anomalous elements within the zone of mineralisation |
· there is a strong positive correlation between Li and Rb grades, which may be associated with the varying presence of micas |
· there is a positive correlation between Nb and Ta grades, which appears to be associated with the presence of columbo-tantalite and/or cassiterite |
· the southern zone of mineralisation contains the highest grades overall, with individual assay values exceeding 2.5% Li2O. In this area, all holes penetrated the host muscovitic leucogranite and ended in the underlying regional granite (Figure 3) |
· In the northeast, the muscovite leucogranite is significantly thicker (>169m in CCR020) and all holes returned Rb2O grades exceeding 1,000ppm (Figure 4) however, Li2O grades are lower than in the south and northwest areas |
· None of the northeastern most holes reached the underlying regional granite, suggesting a potential feeder zone |
· Drilling in the northwest recorded the highest grades of both Li2O and Rb2O, as well as the highest grades of other elements |
Surface geological mapping was also conducted as part of the recent exploration activities. Based on field observations, the surface area occupied by the muscovitic leucogranite is greater than indicated by historical mapping, which when combined with the drilling results, expands the scale of the host unit.
Figure 3: IP Conchas 4,492,225 North Cross Section
Figure 4: IP Conchas 4,492,925 North Cross Section
Next Steps
Representative samples obtained from the three diamond core holes drilled in the 2024 program have been sent to the
The metallurgical test work programs have been designed to assess the potential recovery of Li, Rb and the other elements of economic interest, and comprise crushing and grinding (bond index calculation), gravity (jigs, shaking tables and multi gravity separator), high intensity wet and dry magnetic separation on the concentrates, froth flotation, and characterisation of the samples.
Various workstreams have advanced during the quarter, with results of the metallurgical test work programs anticipated in the
3D modelling of the drilling data is also being undertaken to refine the geological interpretation and assess volumes, average grades and grade distributions for the Li and Rb mineralisation at different cut-offs.
Rubidium1,2,3,4,5
Rubidium is a critical raw material with growing significance in advanced technology and industrial applications, including in the defence and military, aerospace, communications, biomedical and renewable energy sectors.
Its unique properties make it indispensable for producing special crystals used in night-vision equipment and fibre-optic telecommunications systems. Other applications include precision timekeeping in atomic clocks, which are vital for global positioning systems (GPS), telecommunications, and space exploration.
Rubidium compounds play a key role in the production of specialty glasses, cutting-edge electronics, radiation detection devices and medical imaging technologies, ensuring their relevance across multiple high-growth sectors.
Specialty glasses, currently the largest market for rubidium, are utilised in night vision equipment and fibre-optic telecommunications systems. Rubidium carbonate is used as an additive to these types of glass, lowering electrical conductivity and improving stability and durability.
Rubidium's photo-emissive properties lead to its application in motion-sensor devices, night-vision devices, photoelectric cells, and photomultiplier tubes. These applications highlight its importance in advanced electronic devices, particularly in sectors requiring precision and reliability.
Its application in photocells, which convert light into electric currents, is significant. These photocells are primarily used as sensors to regulate lighting in buildings, showcasing rubidium's role in energy-efficient technologies.
Rubidium-based atomic clocks are used in military communication systems, navigation equipment, and precision-guided weapons. The increasing focus on defence modernisation and the need for secure and reliable communication systems are expected to drive the demand for rubidium in the military sector.
Rubidium is also increasingly used as a key component in advanced batteries, particularly in the development of high-energy-density batteries for electric vehicles and renewable energy applications.
Global production of rubidium is limited, with no rubidium production recorded globally outside of China in 2023.
Due to its strategic importance and growing demand in high-tech applications used in key industry sectors, the United States of America and Japan have both classified rubidium as a Critical Mineral, essential to their economic or national security, and with a supply chain vulnerable to disruption.
Oliva and La Majada Projects
These projects comprise three tenements within two project areas in Spain which are considered prospective for tungsten, cobalt, antimony, and other metals.
The Company has designed exploration programs for both projects, communicated with the relevant authorities, and conducted the required studies e.g. a birdlife study at the
An updated Exploration Program for the
International Arbitration Dispute
In
As part of its Request, BEL alleges that Spain's actions against BME and the
In
The Request was submitted by BEL's arbitration lawyers based in Spain. Subsequent to the quarter, BEL agreed an engagement letter with its lawyers to provide ongoing arbitration services on a reduced and capped fee basis that also includes a three percent success fee which is capped and is only payable to the lawyers in the event of a successful award and if monetary damages are received by BEL.
Previously, BEL received the Notice of Registration from ICSID with the Registration of the Arbitration published on the ICSID website. During the quarter, the Tribunal was formally constituted with the first tribunal session to be held in early
Notwithstanding the investment dispute, BEL remains committed to the
Background to Dispute
In
The Company's wholly owned subsidiary, BME, currently holds legal, valid and consolidated rights for the investigation and exploitation of its mining projects, including the 30-year mining licence (renewable for two further periods of 30 years) for the
In
BEL strongly refutes the NSC's assessment and, in its opinion, the NSC adopted an arbitrary decision with the technical issues used as justification to issue the unfavourable report lacking in both technical and legal support.
BME submitted documentation, including an 'Improvement Report' to supplement its initial NSC II application, along with the corresponding arguments that address all the issues raised by the NSC, and a request for its reassessment by the NSC, to MITECO in
Further documentation was submitted to MITECO in
In addition, BME requested from MITECO access to the files associated with the Authorisation for Construction and Authorisation for Dismantling and Closure for the radioactive facilities at La Haba (Badajoz) and Saelices El Chico (Salamanca), which are owned by
Based on a detailed comparison of the different licensing files undertaken by BME following receipt of these files, it is clear that BME, in its NSC II submission, has been required to provide information that does not correspond to: (i) the regulatory framework, (ii) the scope of the current procedural stage (i.e., at the NSC II stage), and/or (iii) the criteria applied in other licensing processes for similar radioactive facilities). Accordingly, BEL considers that the NSC has acted in a discriminatory and arbitrary manner when assessing the NSC II application for the
In BEL's strong opinion, MITECO has rejected BME's NSC II Application without following the legally established procedure, as the Improvement Report has not been taken into account and sent to the NSC for its assessment, as requested on multiple occasions by BME.
In this regard, BEL believes that MITECO have infringed regulations on administrative procedures in Spain but also under protection afforded to BEL under the ECT, which would imply that the decision on the rejection of BME's NSC II Application is not legal.
In
Further, the BME received formal notifications in
The AEUL and the UL were granted to BME in
The appellants subsequently filed administrative appeals against the AEUL and the UL at the first instance courts in Salamanca. The administrative appeals against the AEUL and UL were dismissed in
One of the appellants subsequently lodged appeals before the
BME strongly disagrees with the fundamentals of the TSJ's judgement and having previously submitted cassation appeals against the TSJ judgements before the
Forward Looking Statements
Statements regarding plans with respect to Berkeley's mineral properties are forward-looking statements. There can be no assurance that Berkeley's plans for development of its mineral properties will proceed as currently expected. There can also be no assurance that Berkeley will be able to confirm the presence of additional mineral deposits, that any mineralisation will prove to be economic or that a mine will successfully be developed on any of Berkeley mineral properties. These forward-looking statements are based on Berkeley's expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Berkeley, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Berkeley makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that report.
Competent Persons Statements
The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is extracted from an announcement dated
The information in this announcement that relates to the Mineral Resource Estimate is extracted from an announcement dated
References
1 www.mordorintelligence.com/es/industry-reports/rubidium-market
2 www.straitsresearch.com/report/rubidium-market
3 www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/rubidium-market-27298
4 U.
5 www.usgs.gov/news/national-news-release/us-geological-survey-releases-2022-list-critical-minerals
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the
Appendix 1: Mineral Resource at Salamanca
Deposit Name |
Resource Category |
Tonnes (Mt) |
U3O8 (ppm) |
U3O8 (Mlbs) |
Retortillo |
Measured |
4.1 |
498 |
4.5 |
|
Indicated |
11.3 |
395 |
9.8 |
|
Inferred |
0.2 |
368 |
0.2 |
|
Total |
15.6 |
422 |
14.5 |
Zona 7 |
Measured Indicated |
5.2 10.5 |
674 761 |
7.8 17.6 |
|
Inferred |
6.0 |
364 |
4.8 |
|
Total |
21.7 |
631 |
30.2 |
Alameda |
Indicated |
20.0 |
455 |
20.1 |
|
Inferred |
0.7 |
657 |
1.0 |
|
Total |
20.7 |
462 |
21.1 |
Las Carbas |
Inferred |
0.6 |
443 |
0.6 |
Cristina |
Inferred |
0.8 |
460 |
0.8 |
Caridad |
Inferred |
0.4 |
382 |
0.4 |
Villares |
Inferred |
0.7 |
672 |
1.1 |
Villares North |
Inferred |
0.3 |
388 |
0.2 |
Total Retortillo Satellites |
Total |
2.8 |
492 |
3.0 |
Villar |
Inferred |
5.0 |
446 |
4.9 |
|
Inferred |
1.2 |
472 |
1.3 |
|
Inferred |
1.1 |
492 |
1.2 |
|
Inferred |
1.8 |
531 |
2.1 |
Total Alameda Satellites |
Total |
9.1 |
472 |
9.5 |
Gambuta |
Inferred |
12.7 |
394 |
11.1 |
Salamanca Project Total |
Measured |
9.3 |
597 |
12.3 |
Indicated |
41.8 |
516 |
47.5 |
|
Inferred |
31.5 |
395 |
29.6 |
|
Total (*) |
82.6 |
514 |
89.3 |
Appendix 2: Summary of Mining Tenements
As at
Location |
Tenement Name |
Percentage Interest |
Status |
Spain |
|
|
|
Salamanca |
D.S.R Salamanca 28 (Alameda) |
100% |
Granted |
|
D.S.R Salamanca 29 (Villar) |
100% |
Granted |
|
E.C. Retortillo-Santidad |
100% |
Granted |
|
E.C. Lucero |
100% |
Pending |
|
I.P. Abedules |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Abetos |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Alcornoques |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Alisos |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Bardal |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Barquilla |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Berzosa |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Campillo |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Castaños 2 |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Ciervo |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Conchas |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Dehesa |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. El Águila |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. El Vaqueril |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Espinera |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Horcajada |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Lis |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Mailleras |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Mimbre |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Pedreras |
100% |
Granted |
|
E.P. Herradura* |
100% |
Granted |
Cáceres |
I.P. Almendro E.C. Gambuta |
100% 100% |
Granted^ Pending^ |
|
I.P. Ibor |
100% |
Granted |
|
I.P. Olmos |
100% |
Granted |
Badajoz |
I.P. Los Bélicos |
100% |
Granted** |
|
I.P.A. Ampliación Los Bélicos |
100% |
Pending** |
Ciudad Real |
I.P.A. La Majada |
100% |
Pending** |
*An application for a 1-year extension at E.P. Herradura was previously rejected however this decision has been appealed and the Company awaits the decision regarding its appeal.
^The Company has applied for an Exploitation Concession from the existing IP Almendro.
**Exploracion de Recuros Minerales S.L.U (ERM), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, has entered into a Tenement Sale and Purchase Agreement and Royalty Deed to acquire IP Los Bélicos, IPA Ampliación Los Bélicos, and IPA La Majada.
Appendix 3: Related Party Payments
During the quarter ended
Appendix 4: Exploration and Mining Expenditure
During the quarter ended
Activity |
|
Permitting related expenditure (including legal costs) |
429 |
Drilling related costs |
283 |
Assay costs, radiological protection and monitoring |
31 |
Consultants and other expenditure |
259 |
Payment/(return) of VAT and other social taxes in Spain |
(220) |
Total as reported in the Appendix 5B |
782 |
There were no mining or production activities and expenses incurred during the quarter ended
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration entity
quarterly cash flow report
(a) Name of entity |
||
|
||
(b) ABN |
|
(c) Quarter ended ("current quarter") |
40 052 468 569 |
|
|
Consolidated statement of cash flows |
Current quarter |
Year to date |
|
1. |
Cash flows from operating activities |
- |
- |
1.1 |
Receipts from customers |
||
1.2 |
Payments for |
(782) |
(2,405) |
|
(a) exploration & evaluation |
||
|
(b) development |
- |
- |
|
(c) production |
- |
- |
|
(d) staff costs |
(327) |
(1,064) |
|
(e) administration and corporate costs |
(210) |
(810) |
1.3 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
- |
- |
1.4 |
Interest received |
697 |
2,340 |
1.5 |
Interest and other costs of finance paid |
- |
- |
1.6 |
Income taxes paid |
- |
- |
1.7 |
Government grants and tax incentives |
- |
- |
1.8 |
Other (provide details if material) (a) Business Development (b) Arbitration related expenses |
(88) - |
(201) (1,298) |
1.9 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities |
(710) |
(3,438) |
|
|||
2. |
Cash flows from investing activities |
- |
- |
2.1 |
Payments to acquire or for: |
||
|
(a) entities |
||
|
(b) tenements |
- |
- |
|
(c) property, plant and equipment |
- |
- |
|
(d) exploration & evaluation |
- |
- |
|
(e) investments |
- |
- |
|
(f) other non-current assets |
- |
- |
2.2 |
Proceeds from the disposal of: |
- |
- |
|
(a) entities |
||
|
(b) tenements |
- |
- |
|
(c) property, plant and equipment |
- |
- |
|
(d) investments |
- |
- |
|
(e) other non-current assets |
- |
- |
2.3 |
Cash flows from loans to other entities |
- |
- |
2.4 |
Dividends received (see note 3) |
- |
- |
2.5 |
Other (provide details if material) |
- |
- |
2.6 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities |
- |
- |
|
|||
3. |
Cash flows from financing activities |
- |
- |
3.1 |
Proceeds from issues of equity securities (excluding convertible debt securities) |
||
3.2 |
Proceeds from issue of convertible debt securities |
- |
- |
3.3 |
Proceeds from exercise of options |
- |
- |
3.4 |
Transaction costs related to issues of equity securities or convertible debt securities |
- |
- |
3.5 |
Proceeds from borrowings |
- |
- |
3.6 |
Repayment of borrowings |
- |
- |
3.7 |
Transaction costs related to loans and borrowings |
- |
- |
3.8 |
Dividends paid |
- |
- |
3.9 |
Other (provide details if material) |
- |
- |
3.10 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities |
- |
- |
|
|||
4. |
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the period |
|
|
4.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
79,429 |
77,345 |
4.2 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9 above) |
(710) |
(3,438) |
4.3 |
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities (item 2.6 above) |
- |
- |
4.4 |
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities (item 3.10 above) |
- |
- |
4.5 |
Effect of movement in exchange rates on cash held |
(761) |
4,051 |
4.6 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
77,958 |
77,958 |
5. |
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents |
Current quarter |
Previous quarter |
5.1 |
Bank balances |
77,908 |
79,379 |
5.2 |
Call deposits |
50 |
50 |
5.3 |
Bank overdrafts |
- |
- |
5.4 |
Other (provide details) |
- |
- |
5.5 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal item 4.6 above) |
77,958 |
79,429 |
6. |
Payments to related parties of the entity and their associates |
Current quarter |
6.1 |
Aggregate amount of payments to related parties and their associates included in item 1 |
(94) |
6.2 |
Aggregate amount of payments to related parties and their associates included in item 2 |
- |
Note: if any amounts are shown in items 6.1 or 6.2, your quarterly activity report must include a description of, and an explanation for, such payments. |
7. |
Financing facilities Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the sources of finance available to the entity. |
Total facility amount at quarter end |
|
7.1 |
Loan facilities |
- |
- |
7.2 |
Credit standby arrangements |
- |
- |
7.3 |
Other (please specify) |
- |
- |
7.4 |
Total financing facilities |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
7.5 |
Unused financing facilities available at quarter end |
- |
|
7.6 |
Include in the box below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest rate, maturity date and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional financing facilities have been entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include a note providing details of those facilities as well. |
||
Not applicable |
8. |
Estimated cash available for future operating activities |
$A'000 |
8.1 |
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9) |
(710) |
8.2 |
(Payments for exploration & evaluation classified as investing activities) (item 2.1(d)) |
- |
8.3 |
Total relevant outgoings (item 8.1 + item 8.2) |
(710) |
8.4 |
Cash and cash equivalents at quarter end (item 4.6) |
77,958 |
8.5 |
Unused finance facilities available at quarter end (item 7.5) |
- |
8.6 |
Total available funding (item 8.4 + item 8.5) |
77,958 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
Estimated quarters of funding available (item 8.6 divided by item 8.3) |
>10 |
Note: if the entity has reported positive relevant outgoings (ie a net cash inflow) in item 8.3, answer item 8.7 as "N/A". Otherwise, a figure for the estimated quarters of funding available must be included in item 8.7. |
||
8.8 |
If item 8.7 is less than 2 quarters, please provide answers to the following questions: |
|
|
8.8.1 Does the entity expect that it will continue to have the current level of net operating cash flows for the time being and, if not, why not? |
|
|
Answer: Not applicable |
|
|
8.8.2 Has the entity taken any steps, or does it propose to take any steps, to raise further cash to fund its operations and, if so, what are those steps and how likely does it believe that they will be successful? |
|
|
Answer: Not applicable |
|
|
8.8.3 Does the entity expect to be able to continue its operations and to meet its business objectives and, if so, on what basis? |
|
|
Answer: Not applicable |
|
|
Note: where item 8.7 is less than 2 quarters, all of questions 8.8.1, 8.8.2 and 8.8.3 above must be answered. |
Compliance statement
1 This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
2 This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
Date: 30 April 2025
Authorised by: Company Secretary
(Name of body or officer authorising release - see note 4)
Notes
1. This quarterly cash flow report and the accompanying activity report provide a basis for informing the market about the entity's activities for the past quarter, how they have been financed and the effect this has had on its cash position. An entity that wishes to disclose additional information over and above the minimum required under the Listing Rules is encouraged to do so.
2. If this quarterly cash flow report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly cash flow report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
3. Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.
4. If this report has been authorised for release to the market by your board of directors, you can insert here: "By the board". If it has been authorised for release to the market by a committee of your board of directors, you can insert here: "By the [name of board committee - eg Audit and Risk Committee]". If it has been authorised for release to the market by a disclosure committee, you can insert here: "By the Disclosure Committee".
5. If this report has been authorised for release to the market by your board of directors and you wish to hold yourself out as complying with recommendation 4.2 of the ASX Corporate Governance Council's Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations, the board should have received a declaration from its CEO and CFO that, in their opinion, the financial records of the entity have been properly maintained, that this report complies with the appropriate accounting standards and gives a true and fair view of the cash flows of the entity, and that their opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal control which is operating effectively.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our Privacy Policy.