
13 October 2025
("Mosman" or the "Company")
Coyote Wash Project - Prospective Gross Helium Resources of 1,072 MMcf
Highlights
· Best estimate 2U gross prospective helium resources of 1,072 MMcf (million cubic feet) calculated across six identified prospects at Coyote Wash, using parameters consistent with the recent independent evaluation of the nearby
· Resource model incorporates known reservoir properties from the Coyote Wash 30-12 well and helium concentration data of 2.7% He measured at Mosman's Sagebrush-1 well, located 5 miles to the southwest.
· Coyote Wash lies in an established helium-producing region with proven reservoir deliverability in the Middle and Lower Leadville formations.
Coyote Wash Project
Technical evaluations by Mosman and its partner Four Corners Helium (FCH) have focused on reinterpretation of vintage well data and reprocessed 3D seismic to understand the resource potential within the project area. The Coyote Wash 30-12 well, drilled by Wintershall in 1985, encountered 258 feet of
A detailed petrophysical interpretation of Coyote Wash 30-12 and nearby offset wells was subsequently undertaken by FCH to determine key reservoir parameters for resource calculations. Interpretation of the reprocessed 3D seismic has defined six individual prospects at the
Helium was confirmed at Mosman's Sagebrush-1 well, located five miles southwest of Coyote Wash 30-12, with measured concentrations of 2.7% He. Regional gas and production data indicate that similar commercial helium concentrations are likely to be present at Coyote Wash, and this value has been used to calculate the prospective helium resources across the six defined structures.
In determining reservoir parameters, Mosman adopted a 5% porosity value for the southern Coyote Wash prospects, consistent with the conservative "most likely" porosity used by Sproule ERCE in their recent independent analysis of the Sagebrush resource. A higher 8% porosity was applied to the Coyote Wash North prospect, reflecting its proximity to the Coyote Wash 30-12 well and the high reservoir quality observed there.
Figure 1: Coyote Wash project area and Coyote Wash North location
Figure 2: Two-way time structure map and prospects,
Mosman will now formally engage Sproule ERCE, the independent consultant who recently verified helium prospective resources at Sagebrush, to conduct a detailed assessment and certification of the Coyote Wash prospective resources.
This work will provide a third-party validation of Mosman's internal estimates and form the basis for future drilling and development planning.
Table 1: Prospective Resources at Coyote Wash
Best Estimate 2U Prospective Resources (MMcf) |
||||||||||
|
|
Recoverable Helium |
|
|||||||
Coyote Wash North |
31,298 |
509 |
|
|||||||
Coyote Wash South-1 |
15,878 |
260 |
|
|||||||
Coyote Wash South-2 |
5,076 |
82 |
|
|||||||
Coyote Wash South-3 |
5,101 |
67 |
|
|||||||
Coyote Wash South-4 |
5,529 |
90 |
|
|||||||
Coyote Wash South-5 |
3,959 |
64 |
|
|||||||
Total |
65,942 |
1,072 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net of Royalty |
|
54,072 |
|
|
879 |
|
|
|||
Mosman % (net) |
|
54,072 |
|
|
879 |
|
|
|||
Source: Mosman / FCH estimates |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Notes |
|
|
|
|
||||||
1. The estimated quantities of gas that may potentially be recovered by the application of a future development project relates to undeveloped accumulations. These estimates have a risk of development. Further appraisal and evaluation are required to determine the optimal development plan and commerciality. |
||||||||||
2. The natural gas resource estimates have been derived in accordance with the principles of the Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS). The PRMS specifically applies to petroleum. However, the |
||||||||||
3. The resource estimates are presented on a net entitlements basis and represent Mosman's net economic interest in the prospective recoverable hydrogen and helium volumes after deductions for an 14% royalty and the 100% working interest. Royalty rate escalates over an initial 12-year period from 14% to 18%. Thereafter it remains at 18%. |
||||||||||
4. The Prospective Resources have been evaluated using deterministic methods and represent best estimates. A low case and high case were not estimated. |
||||||||||
5. The estimates are for naturally occurring gas only. No adjustment has been made to the estimates to account for fuel and flare |
||||||||||
Qualified Person Statement
The information contained in this announcement has been reviewed and approved by
Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) Disclosure
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 ('MAR') which has been incorporated into
Enquiries:
Chairman
|
NOMAD and Joint Broker +44 (0) 20 3470 0470 |
Tel: +44 (0) 7976 431608 |
Joint Broker +44 (0) 020 3003 8632 |
Updates on the Company's activities are regularly posted on its website: www.mosmanoilandgas.com
Notes to editors
Mosman (AIM: MSMN) is a helium, hydrogen and hydrocarbon exploration, development, and production company with projects in the US and
Proposed Change of
At the forthcoming Annual General Meeting on
Glossary
Term |
Definition |
1U / Low Estimate |
At least a 90% probability that the quantities recovered will equal or exceed this estimate. |
2U / Best Estimate |
At least a 50% probability that the quantities recovered will equal or exceed this estimate. Often considered the "most likely" case. |
3U / High Estimate |
At least a 10% probability that the quantities recovered will equal or exceed this estimate. Represents upside potential. |
DST (Drill Stem Test) |
A temporary well test conducted to determine the presence and productivity of hydrocarbons or helium in a formation. |
MMscf |
Million standard cubic feet of gas, measured at standard conditions of temperature and pressure. |
Mscf |
Thousand standard cubic feet of gas, measured at standard conditions of temperature and pressure. |
Porosity |
The percentage of pore volume or void space, or that volume within rock that can contain fluids. Porosity can be generated by the development of fractures, in which case it is called fracture porosity. Effective porosity is the interconnected pore volume in a rock that contributes to fluid flow in a reservoir. It excludes isolated pores. Total porosity is the total void space in the rock whether or not it contributes to fluid flow. Thus, effective porosity is typically less than total porosity. |
PRMS |
Petroleum Resources Management System, the globally recognized framework issued by the |
Prospective Resource |
Those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from undiscovered accumulations by application of future development projects. |
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the