(AIM: SAV) ('Savannah', or the 'Company')
Dismissal of Legal Claim
Dismissal of another legal claim made in relation to the Project
The Administrative and
The Court's ruling confirms unequivocal validity and conformity of the Concession. The claimant has the option to appeal to the Central Administrative Court.
This decision represents the eighth consecutive positive judgment for Savannah out of eight total decisions made across initial court rulings, appeals and injunctions (See Table 1 for further details).
There are now four[1] remaining ongoing court cases in relation to the Project (see table 3 below for further details). None of the four cases affect Savannah's progress with the Project. In two of the cases, the legal opinions state that they are, like the cases which have been dismissed, without merit.
The third case relates to disputed borders on small packages of land (8 hectares in total) purchased by Savannah from private landowners ('Land Borders Dispute', see table 3 below for further details and
The remaining case is a claim submitted by Savannah against the Covas Baldios, where Savannah requests acknowledgement that it has been fulfilling all its legal and contractual obligations in the lease of a portion of the Baldios property, located in the NOA area, currently under exploitation.
Savannah's Chief Executive Officer,
"As stated previously, we know that we face strong scrutiny, and for that reason we are even more diligent in our efforts, which is in itself a reassurance for all our shareholders. Savannah continues to advance the Project with confidence and determination, and with a firm commitment to the strict legality of all processes and operations it carries out."
Additional information
Table 1: Summary of rulings in legal cases brought in
|
Case |
Case Summary |
Plaintiff |
Defendants |
Counter Interested Parties |
Sentence/Ruling (Court) |
|
C-100 Mining License Amendments (Commenced |
Claim aimed to declare null the administrative acts regarding the Exploitation of the "Mina do Barroso" Project, signed in 2016, invoking administrative irregularities performed by the |
|
|
Savannah |
Dismissed ( |
|
C-100 Mining License Amendments (Commenced |
Repetition of the above case |
|
|
Savannah |
Dismissed ( |
|
Land Borders Dispute (Commenced |
Injunction presented by the Covas Baldios, requesting the Court to forbid Savannah to work in areas under dispute. |
Baldios of Covas do Barroso |
Savannah and 6 other private owners |
N/A |
Injunction not approved ( |
|
Injunction against the Temporary Land Easement (Commenced in |
Claim aimed to declare null the administrative acts regarding the Temporary Land Easement, made official by the Government on |
3 Private Landowners |
|
Savannah, DGEG, Covas Parish, Baldios and the other private owners in the Temporary Easement Process |
Case dismissed ( |
|
Contestation of the Grounded Resolution that lifted the works suspension under the Land Easement (Commenced in - Lawsuit 36/25.9BEMDL |
Claim aimed to revoke the Grounded Resolution issued by the Portuguese Government and also intended to sanction Savannah for allegedly executing works during the suspension period |
3 Private Landowners |
|
Savannah, DGEG, Covas Parish, Baldios and the other private owners in the Temporary Easement Process |
Contestation rejected ( |
|
Appeal against ruling given in Lawsuit 36/25.9BEMDL (see above) |
Appeal against ruling given in |
3 Private Landowners |
|
Savannah, DGEG, Covas Parish, Baldios and the other private owners in the Temporary Easement Process |
Appeal rejected ( |
|
Criminal complaint for assault to a former Savannah employee (Commenced |
Claim aimed to condemn Mr. |
Former Savannah employee |
Mr. |
|
Mr. |
|
Defamation |
Mr. |
Mr. |
Savannah |
N/A |
Case dismissed following the ruling against |
Table 2: Summary of a case submitted to the
|
Case |
Case Summary |
Communicant |
The Party Concerned |
Observers |
Findings, Recommendations & Responses |
|
Alleged failure of |
The communicant alleged that access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in Environmental Matters under articles 4 (1), (2), (3)(c) and (7) and 6 (3) and (4) of the |
The Spanish non-profit organisation, Fundação Montescola |
Portuguese Government |
|
The Convention's Compliance Committee found that the Party concerned had failed to comply with certain articles of the
Responses from Portuguese entities:
|
Table 3: Summary of current legal claims brought in
|
Case |
Case Summary |
Plaintiff |
Defendants |
Counter Interested Parties |
Status (Court) |
|
Land Borders Dispute (Commenced |
Claim aims to challenge the registration of certain areas and limits of certain parcels of 6 land properties in the C-100 licence area |
Baldios of Covas do Barroso |
Savannah and 6 other private owners |
N/A |
Waiting for a Preliminary Hearing (Vila Real Judicial Court) |
|
Lease Dispute (Commenced |
Claim submitted by Savannah to confirm that it has been fulfilling all its legal and contractual obligations under the lease agreement entered into with the Baldios of Covas do Barroso. |
Savannah |
Baldios of Covas do Barroso |
N/A |
Preliminary hearing scheduled for |
|
Administrative Claim Against the favorable DIA (Commenced |
Claim aims to declare null the administrative acts regarding the Declaration of Impact Assessment, issued by APA on |
|
|
Savannah |
All the Defendants, including Savannah, have now lodged their defences, and the case is awaiting further proceedings (Fiscal and
Based on the opinion from our legal advisers this case is without merit. |
|
Administrative Claims against the Temporary Land Easement (Commenced in |
Claim aims to declare null the administrative acts regarding the Temporary Land Easement, made official by the Government on |
3 different lawsuits, with the same arguments, presented by: 1. 3 Private Landowners 2. Baldios of Covas do Barroso 3. |
|
Savannah, DGEG, Covas Parish, Baldios and the other private owners in the Temporary Easement Process |
After dismissing the injunction, the Court agreed to collate the 3 lawsuits into a single case. Preliminary Hearing awaited (Fiscal and
Based on the opinion from our legal advisers this case is without merit. |
Savannah - Enabling
**ENDS**

Follow @SavannahRes on X (Formerly known as Twitter)
Follow
For further information please visit www.savannahresources.com or contact:
|
|
Tel: +44 20 7117 2489
|
|
|
Tel: +44 20 3470 0470
|
|
|
Tel: +44 20 7523 8000
|
|
Media Relations |
Tel: +351 962 678 912 |
About Savannah
Through the Project, Savannah will help
Savannah is focused on the responsible development and operation of the
The Company is listed and regulated on the
[1] Operation Influencer is not one of these cases as neither Savannah nor any of its directors or employees are defendants (termed as "arguidos" in Portuguese) in this investigation which was initiated by the
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the