This content is only available within our institutional offering.

30 Jul 2025
FY 25 guidance falling short

Sign in
This content is only available to commercial clients. Sign in if you have access or contact support@research-tree.com to set up a commercial account
This content is only available to commercial clients. Sign in if you have access or contact support@research-tree.com to set up a commercial account
FY 25 guidance falling short
Imerys (NK:EPA), 0 | Imerys SA (NK:PAR), 0
- Published:
30 Jul 2025 -
Author:
Lahmidi Mourad ML -
Pages:
11 -
Q2 25 results broadly in line, guidance falling short
Imerys'' Q2 25 sales were down 10.7% and down 1.5% LFL to EUR886m as volumes contracted 3.3% due to the adverse demand backdrop in Europe. Adj. EBITDA declined 22% to EUR154m, reflecting 1) lower contribution from the Quartz JV due to excess inventories in solar end markets and 2) the deconsolidation of paper-related activities (at constant perimeter and ex. JV, EBITDA was up 1.7% thanks to cost savings). The group guides for FY 25 EBITDA of EUR540m-580m, which compares to Bloomberg consensus at EUR605m.
Lithium project seeing capex overruns and delays
Management now expects the Lithium project to start commercial production in 2030 vs. 2028 in its initial estimate. The group also pointed to increased capex for the project, from EUR1.0bn to EUR1.8bn. The capex uplift was said to be due to ESG compliance enhancement and inflation. The group also highlighted that due to market conditions, it is now seeking partners to support the project.
We cut our estimates and TP - Neutral maintained
We have cut our EPS est. by 36%/29% in 2025E/2026E to factor in the guidance shortfall, lower contribution from the Quartz JV and higher financial results. We have also reduced our TP from EUR30 to EUR22 to reflect 1) lower earnings forecasts for the core business, for which our valuation comes out at EUR24 (average of ROCE/WACC and DCF methods), 2) a negative NPV for the Lithium project (minus c.EUR2/share), reflecting the further decline in Lithium prices (at c. EUR10/kg vs. unit operating costs projected by management at EUR7-EUR9/kg), and 3) the sharp increase in projected capex for the project. We keep our Neutral stance.